[Anthill-pro] AHP 2.5.0 Deployment Build Manager

[vvv at urbancode.com]

Ok, you must be doing something wrong because I just did a small test and
the script that executes displays the value entered in the "build as
version" field, not the referenced track version.
Keep in mind that the property that you are using to store the value
should probably be different from the default version property or you need
to remove the old version property from the definition before you can use
the new one (which I am not sure is possible).


> I tried that, too. The first event in the list is  "Execute script before
> Anthill checks out or updates the source." Outcome using this option is
> the
> same. I also upgraded to  2.6.2.19159 to make sure it is not a 2.5 issue.
>
>
> On 11/17/06, vvv at urbancode.com <vvv at urbancode.com> wrote:
>>
>> Try running the script at the first event available (I think that was
>> before the source is checked out). Anything else will probably be too
>> late.
>>
>> > The script error was an environment issue, but the solution still does
>> not
>> > work. For this build event, buildDef.getVersionNumber() already
>> returns
>> > the
>> > overridden version, not the one entered through the UI.
>> >
>> > I see in the deployment build manager log the value entered, it is
>> > different
>> > from  buildDef.getVersionNumber().
>> >
>> > Could this be an issue with the order of build property providers?
>> >
>> > Any thoughts?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/16/06, Thomas Weise <thomas.weise at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  With the sample code from
>> >> http://wiki.urbancode.com/home/Build_Property_Provider
>> >>
>> >> the log shows the script error below (run in jboss-3.2.7) while javac
>> >> would compile the code in eclipse:
>> >>
>> >> 18:07:45,287 INFO  [STDOUT] 3569212 ERROR
>> >> com.urbancode.anthill2.impl.listeners.
>> >> buildeventaction.BuildEventAction  - Error from action script!
>> >> com.urbancode.anthill2.module.AnthillModuleException: Bean Scripting
>> >> Framework e
>> >> rror: The application script threw an exception: Sourced file: inline
>> >> evaluation
>> >>  of: ``import com.urbancode.anthill2.build.Buildable;  import
>> >> com.urbancode.anth
>> >> ill2.bu . . . '' : Exception in constructor: Constructor error: the
>> >> number
>> >> of ar
>> >> guments was wrong : at Line: 28 : in file: inline evaluation of:
>> >> ``import
>> >> com.ur
>> >> bancode.anthill2.build.Buildable;  import com.urbancode.anthill2.bu .
>> .
>> >> .
>> >> '' : n
>> >> ew BuildPropertyDescriptor ( propertyName , description , this )
>> >>
>> >> Called from method: _bsfApply : at Line: -1 : in file: <Called from
>> Java
>> >> Code> :
>> >>  <Compiled Java Code> : Constructor error: the number of arguments
>> was
>> >> wrong : a
>> >> t Line: 28 : in file: inline evaluation of: ``import
>> >> com.urbancode.anthill2.buil
>> >> d.Buildable;  import com.urbancode.anthill2.bu . . . '' : new
>> >> BuildPropertyDescr
>> >> iptor ( propertyName , description , this )
>> >>
>> >> Called from method: _bsfApply : at Line: -1 : in file: <Called from
>> Java
>> >> Code> :
>> >>  <Compiled Java Code> BSF info: BuildPropertyProvider at line: 0
>> column:
>> >> columnN
>> >> o
>> >>         at
>> >> com.urbancode.anthill2.impl.utility.scripting.ScriptImpl.evaluate
>> (Unk
>> >> nown Source)
>> >>         at
>> >> com.urbancode.anthill2.impl.listeners.buildeventaction.BuildEventActi
>> >> on.runScript(BuildEventAction.java:157)
>> >>         at
>> >> com.urbancode.anthill2.impl.listeners.buildeventaction.BuildEventActi
>> >> on.buildRequired(BuildEventAction.java:86)
>> >>         at
>> >> com.urbancode.anthill2.impl.project.BuildTrack.fireBuildRequiredEvent
>> >> (Unknown Source)
>> >>         at
>> >> com.urbancode.anthill2.impl.buildmanager.basic.BasicBuildManager.buil
>> >> d(Unknown Source)
>> >>         at com.urbancode.anthill2.build.BuildDefinition.run(Unknown
>> >> Source)
>> >>         at
>> >> com.urbancode.anthill2.impl.queue.DefaultBuildDaemon.run(Unknown
>> >> Sour
>> >> ce)
>> >> 18:07:45,287 ERROR [BuildEventAction] Error from action script!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  On 11/16/06, Thomas Weise <thomas.weise at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Eric,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for the reply. I have configured the build event action and
>> put
>> >> > in place the script, but it does not seem to have any effect. I
>> >> checked the
>> >> > log files and there are no error messages. How can I debug the
>> script
>> >> > execution?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Thomas
>> >> >
>> >> >  On 11/16/06, Eric Minick <etm at urbancode.com> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I believe that is intentional. Because the number assigned in the
>> >> > > original build is supposed to be the version and the deployment
>> >> build
>> >> > > manager is just deploying that build, it keeps the same number.
>> This
>> >> > > is
>> >> > > addressed in 3.0, but allowing you to have multiple build numbers
>> on
>> >> a
>> >> > > single build as secondary processes apply numbering stamps.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > The documentation and latest download for 2.x are both available
>> >> from
>> >> > > the downloads page:
>> >> > > https://www.anthillpro.com/html/products/anthillpro/download.html
>> >> > >
>> >> > > To grab the one entered through the UI, you could use this
>> script:
>> >> > > http://wiki.urbancode.com/home/Build_Property_Provider
>> >> > >
>> >> > > You would want to grab the value out of
>> buildDef.getVersionNumber()
>> >> > > and
>> >> > > store it. Immediately after the build is required, it gets
>> stomped
>> >> on.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > So if you ran that script either on the BuildRequired event or
>> the
>> >> > > BuildRequested event, you'd be fine.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > -- Eric
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thomas Weise wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > I have an issue with the Deployment Build Manager where the
>> build
>> >> > > > script does not retrieve the value entered under "Build as
>> >> Version"
>> >> > > in
>> >> > > > the build tab. Instead, the version is always passed as the
>> latest
>> >> > > > built version from the reference track. Is this a bug in the
>> AHP
>> >> > > > version used?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > If not, how can I fetch the version number entered in the UI
>> and
>> >> > > pass
>> >> > > > it on to the script?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Is there an online version of the 2.x documentation (cannot
>> find
>> >> it
>> >> > > on
>> >> > > > the 2.5 installation we are using)? Is there a download for the
>> >> > > latest
>> >> > > > 2.x patches?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Thanks!
>> >> > > > Thomas
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >_______________________________________________
>> >> > > >Anthill-pro mailing list
>> >> > > >Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
>> >> > > > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > > Anthill-pro mailing list
>> >> > > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
>> >> > > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Anthill-pro mailing list
>> > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
>> > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anthill-pro mailing list
>> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
>> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill-pro mailing list
> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>