[Anthill-pro] Question about job failure within workflows

[Jeff Rodgers (jerodger)]

I am seeing the same problem. If job #2 in a workflow fails, job #3
still runs. The status at the end of the workflow does show "Failed"
even if job #3 is successful.

Jeff Rodgers
Cisco Remote Operations Services

-----Original Message-----
From: anthill-pro-bounces at caladin.urbancode.com
[mailto:anthill-pro-bounces at caladin.urbancode.com] On Behalf Of Eric
Minick
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 10:55 AM
To: anthill-pro at caladin.urbancode.com
Subject: Re: [Anthill-pro] Question about job failure within workflows

Chad,

I need to look into this. Is the problem that a job fails, and then the
next job is executed anyway?

-- Eric

Chad Loder wrote:

>Hi. I have noticed that when a step of a workflow fails, the next tasks

>in the workflow execute regardless. Is there a way to have the workflow

>abort and fail when a step fails, rather than continuing on and 
>attempting all the next steps?
>
>Thanks,
>	c
>_______________________________________________
>Anthill-pro mailing list
>Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Anthill-pro mailing list
Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro