[Anthill-pro] Perforce changelists
Eric Minick
etm at urbancode.com
Tue Sep 4 09:36:29 CDT 2007
There's two requests for changes from Perforce when the quiet period is
active. The first is checking for changes in the last few minutes that
would impact the quiet period.
The second is actually looking for the changes to the application since
the prior build so those can go into a report and all that good stuff.
If you want to disable the second request for changes, that can be done too.
-- Eric
Uldis Karlovs-Karlovskis wrote:
> This is the most interesting part because there is no errors. This is log
> from build request:
> Tue Sep 04 15:43:44 EEST 2007: Requested by Buildlife 476 of Project ACTP
> (61), Workflow Daily Build Main (111)
>
> Now I`m turned off quite period because it really crushes my custom build
> processes. But on production I see that changelog is retrieved anyway so
> this can`t be the problem. So what`s going on?...
>
> Does anybody can really explain how p4 is integrated in AntHill and how
> these quite periods works?
>
> Uldis, C. T. Co
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com
> [mailto:anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com] On Behalf Of Eric Minick
> Sent: otrdiena, 2007. gada 4. septembrī 16:40
> To: AnthillPro user and support list.
> Subject: Re: [Anthill-pro] Perforce changelists
>
> Until you have a successful build with a project, there is no baseline
> to get the changelog against. That message in and of itself generally
> doesn't indicate an error.
>
> Is the build request failing? If so, click into the job link under the
> build request. You should be able to see more about what's going wrong
> there.
>
> Regards,
>
> Eric
>
> Uldis Karlovs-Karlovskis wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I`m stucked in again with problems with p4 changelists. I`ve tried many
>> different source configurations but everytime in step "Get ChangeLog"
>> AntHill log says: "First build life of project ACTP with war, FIT
>> post-build. Get change log step skipped." On production I have the same
>> source configuration and I even tried to change it but it works fine.
>>
> Where
>
>> may be a problem?
>>
>>
>> Uldis, C. T. Co
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anthill-pro mailing list
>> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
>> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill-pro mailing list
> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill-pro mailing list
> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>
>
More information about the Anthill-pro
mailing list