[Anthill-pro] using two different svn repositories

Alexandre Borgia alexandre.borgia at ubisoft.com
Fri Apr 11 17:44:58 CDT 2008


We have the same situation here as well ... in our case it is logical to use the different repositories in different workflows so it is not much of a problem, except when it comes to the build-scripts/tools we use for building.  They are all centralized in the same repository and we must deploy them using a custom sync step when we are not working on this one.

 

            - Alexandre Borgia

 

________________________________

De : anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com [mailto:anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com] De la part de Eric Minick
Envoyé : 11 avril 2008 18:17
À : AnthillPro user and support list.
Cc : AnthillPro user and support list.
Objet : Re: [Anthill-pro] using two different svn repositories

 

An "always force" pull dependency wouldn work as well. You would just have to trick re two related workflows into running on The same machine. 




On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:57 PM, "Samuel Cameron" <Samuel.Cameron at marketlive.com> wrote:

	If you must have two different repositories, you could create two workflows. Have the second workflow depend on the first and always start when the first one finishes. This is not ideal, but better than doing manual steps.

	 

	Sam Cameron

	 

	
________________________________


	From: anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com [mailto:anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com] On Behalf Of Steve Boone
	Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 11:43 AM
	To: AnthillPro user and support list.
	Subject: Re: [Anthill-pro] using two different svn repositories

	 

	Why is the source for one project in two different repositories?  
	
	I would think that would cause many different issues.  Generally, the code for a project, is all stored in the same place.  That makes keeping track of the branches, tags, etc much more reasonable and cleaner.  

	On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:21 PM, emerson cargnin < <mailto:echofloripa.yell at gmail.com> echofloripa.yell at gmail.com> wrote:

	Hi
	
	Is there any plan to allow the use of two different repository
	locations (both of the same type) in the same workflow? I'm havin gto
	do a half deploy manually because I can't do it in one go with a
	single workflow. If i separate it into another workflow then my deploy
	workflow (based on the first one) won't pick this up. A second option
	would be to add a job to run a shell and run an svn co manually, but I
	think this will end up been really complicated if I want to enable
	branches, tags, etc to be used...
	
	thanks
	emerson
	_______________________________________________
	Anthill-pro mailing list
	<mailto:Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
	<http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro

	_______________________________________________
	Anthill-pro mailing list
	Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
	http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.urbancode.com/pipermail/anthill-pro/attachments/20080411/9a1a1da4/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Anthill-pro mailing list