[Anthill-pro] Anthill Pro Server -> lib/ext jar

Frederic Jean frederic.jean at ubisoft.com
Thu Aug 14 13:54:42 CDT 2008


I created my own jar and included it in lib/ext then I import it in my script.

Simple question : Every time I update the jar in the lib/ext folder do I need to restart the server ?

Thank you
Frederic Jean


-----Message d'origine-----
De : anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com [mailto:anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com] De la part de Heather Wells
Envoyé : 14 août 2008 14:27
À : AnthillPro user and support list.
Objet : Re: [Anthill-pro] Another push dependency question

I managed to temporarily fix the problem by re-creating each  
workflow.  Now I'm running into the same problem again.  Workflows  
with a push dependency will have build request with a blank status and  
a build life of "N/A."   Restarting the server seems to get these  
stuck builds to start.


On Aug 13, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Heather Wells wrote:

> Obviously I meant 3.5.3_14575
>
> On Aug 13, 2008, at 10:59 AM, Heather Wells wrote:
>
>> I'm using 3.5.4_14575
>>
>> When I try setting this up, the first two workflows complete  
>> successfully, but the third workflow never fires a build and I can  
>> see no indication why it isn't firing (no "Waiting for Dependency"  
>> or "Determining Quiet Period" etc.).
>>
>> Heather
>>
>> On Aug 13, 2008, at 8:28 AM, Ryan Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Heather,
>>>
>>> C will build, but it must wait for B to finish and it will only  
>>> occur if B is successful.
>>>
>>> Which version are you using?
>>>
>>> Ryan Smith
>>>
>>> Heather Wells wrote:
>>>> I've found that I can "cascade" pull dependencies; for example  
>>>> Workflow A pulls from Workflow B which in turn pulls from  
>>>> Workflow C.  However, I can't do this with push dependencies.  If  
>>>> Workflow A pushes Workflow B which pushes Workflow C, then  
>>>> Workflow C will never fire a build.  It will generate a build  
>>>> request with no status and a Build Life of "N/A."  The log for  
>>>> the build request is blank.
>>>>
>>>> Is this expected behavior?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Heather
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Anthill-pro mailing list
>>>> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
>>>> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Anthill-pro mailing list
>>> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
>>> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anthill-pro mailing list
>> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
>> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill-pro mailing list
> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro

_______________________________________________
Anthill-pro mailing list
Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro


More information about the Anthill-pro mailing list