[Anthill-pro] Can we set our own agent.id property?

[emerson cargnin]

I'd be also very interested in the answer of this question.

regards
emerson

On 30/07/2008, Peter Steele <psteele at maxiscale.com> wrote:
> Okay, that's exactly what my tests seemed to show. That's good; this
> will really simplify our lives. The other related issue is how to
> automate the addition of multiple agents simultaneously. We're about to
> add 50+ agents and each one needs to be placed in the appropriate
> environment and have the proper security settings assigned. It seems we
> have to do this one agent at a time, and this can get very tedious for
> large numbers of agents. Is there any way to automate this process?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com
> [mailto:anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:13 AM
> To: AnthillPro user and support list.
> Subject: Re: [Anthill-pro] Can we set our own agent.id property?
>
> Peter,
>
> Yes you can set it. It is best to set it during the installation or just
>
> after installation and before first starting the agent. We only ask that
>
> you make it unique.
>
> Change the id of an existing agent will make it appear as if a new agent
>
> is installed and the old one will not be usable.
>
>
> Ryan
>
> Peter Steele wrote:
> >
> > When a new agent is installed the field agent.id in the
> > agent.properties file is auto-generated as a unique key, e.g.
> >
> > locked/agent.id=emNqOTBqM2F6M3oweHlzdjQ1Nj
> >
> > Can we set this field ourselves? More specifically, after installing
> > an agent and before starting it for the first time, can we set this
> > field to
> >
> > locked/agent.id=<hostname>
> >
> > where <hostname> is the name of the machine where this agent is
> > installed. The reasons we need to do this are long and complex and I
> > won't elaborate here, at least for now. I've done some simple tests
> > and Anthill doesn't seem to mind if we set this property manually. I'd
>
> > like some verification though from the experts whether this is safe to
>
> > do. Thanks.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill-pro mailing list
> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill-pro mailing list
> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>