[Anthill-pro] Anthill Pro Management Vs Developpers

[Yanko, Curtis]

I could be mistaken but I think role based security does that for us.
Dev teams see only their projects while us admins see it all plus the
admin interface.
 
===
-Curt
W: 860.702.9059
M: 860.881.2050
 

________________________________

From: anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com
[mailto:anthill-pro-bounces at lists.urbancode.com] On Behalf Of Frederic
Jean
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 3:23 PM
To: Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
Cc: Dany Aubut
Subject: [Anthill-pro] Anthill Pro Management Vs Developpers



Well , its more of a discussion than an actual question.   First let me
explain the context and I hope  I'll be clear enough J

 

Since our department have double in resources and projects, a dedicated
support team was created and a need for a centralized/standardized build
system solution is needed.

 

One of our requirement was to  create a clear division between the build
system management and the build system display(I will call that
dashboard). Our old build system was something like the current Anthill
Pro , what I mean by that is that all type of user interacted with the
system either it's a developer/qa/build system admin using the same
access point/interface with security. 

 

The developer still had access to the whole build process which most of
the time 80% of it is irrelevant to them (the only thing that matters is
build and test log ++)  and every projects had their own build system
and managing them.  For  3 weeks I have started evaluating Anthill Pro
and build a working prototype and trying to cover most of our
requirements using it so far, I'm very pleased with the product J

 

But still, we would really like to create that division between the
management and the view that contain only the usefull information
(dashboard) .

 

So far as a solution, I thought about creating and asp.net website
connecting  to the SOAP to fetch project and workflow and then hook
directly to the Database to display  only information that really
matters to developer. Problem that come with that solution is that I
need to duplicate log and artifact on a share as I don't want developers
to access anthill pro website at all. 

 

Am I the first user to have that kind of requirement while using Anthill
Pro and what approach they used ?

Is this something the team is aware  ? 

Is this something that might be looked into future development of the
product ?

Am I on the right track while using Anthill Pro or is there something
I'm missing ?

 

Thank you

 

Frederic Jean

Programmeur Outils - GT
Ubisoft (Montreal)
E-mail: frederic.jean at ubisoft.com



This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or 
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended 
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is 
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.urbancode.com/pipermail/anthill-pro/attachments/20080328/63968201/attachment.htm