[Anthill-pro] Workflow resources

[emerson cargnin]

On 07/05/2008, Steve Boone <sbb at urbancode.com> wrote:
> Emerson,
>
> You can add a cleanup step to the end of your build, that would clean up
> your code for you.
>

Couldn't this part of the normal clean process? The one configured in
the life-cycle model? It seems like it makes sense to have it done
during the cleanup schedule...

> If you were re-using your working directory, this wouldn't be an issue
> either because you can choose to do clean the directory every time you do a
> checkout.

I was, but I would get svn errors, as in the build from tag I get from
different places...

>
> Essentially, the feature is there, its just how you choose to set it up.
>
> If you are using different working directories for each build, and not using
> a clean up step, then yes, you will have plenty of code laying around.
>

I couldn't find a "clean up step". The only way i can think of is
adding a "Set Working Directory" workflow and choose the "Clean
Working Directory"


>
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:42 AM, emerson cargnin
> <echofloripa.yell at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Steve
> >
> > Is there any reason for it to keep all things it checked out?
> > For each branch, or cuild from a tag, it dowloads more than 80 mega in
> > code, JSP's and other stuff used for deployment. After a few builds it
> > clutters the disk with things that can be checkout again if needed...
> >
> > Wouldn't be a good idea to have it as a feature?
> >
> > regards
> >
> >
> >
> > emerson
> >
> >
> > On 07/05/2008, Steve Boone <sbb at urbancode.com> wrote:
> > > That is correct, it only cleans up the artifacts.
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:38 AM, emerson cargnin
> > > <echofloripa.yell at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > But not the source that was checkedout for that workflow run, right?
> > > > at least i had to remove it manually, as after deleting the build
> > > > life, the sources were still there.
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > emerson
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 07/05/2008, Steve Boone <sbb at urbancode.com> wrote:
> > > > > It deletes all the artifacts of the build.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:16 AM, emerson cargnin
> > > <echofloripa.yell at gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I delete a build life, shouldn't it also delete everything it
> > > used
> > > > > for the build life?
> > > > > > In my case they were all still there, even after removing the
> > > build-life.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards
> > > > > > emerson
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > > > > > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > > > > >
> > > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > > > > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > > > >
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > > > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > > >
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill-pro mailing list
> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>
>