[Anthill-pro] Workflow resources
Steve Boone
sbb at urbancode.com
Wed May 7 10:04:56 CDT 2008
Check your source steps, you are using SVN right? There is an SVN clean up
step.
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:00 AM, emerson cargnin <echofloripa.yell at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 07/05/2008, Steve Boone <sbb at urbancode.com> wrote:
> > Emerson,
> >
> > You can add a cleanup step to the end of your build, that would clean up
> > your code for you.
> >
>
> Couldn't this part of the normal clean process? The one configured in
> the life-cycle model? It seems like it makes sense to have it done
> during the cleanup schedule...
>
> > If you were re-using your working directory, this wouldn't be an issue
> > either because you can choose to do clean the directory every time you
> do a
> > checkout.
>
> I was, but I would get svn errors, as in the build from tag I get from
> different places...
>
> >
> > Essentially, the feature is there, its just how you choose to set it up.
> >
> > If you are using different working directories for each build, and not
> using
> > a clean up step, then yes, you will have plenty of code laying around.
> >
>
> I couldn't find a "clean up step". The only way i can think of is
> adding a "Set Working Directory" workflow and choose the "Clean
> Working Directory"
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:42 AM, emerson cargnin
> > <echofloripa.yell at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > Is there any reason for it to keep all things it checked out?
> > > For each branch, or cuild from a tag, it dowloads more than 80 mega in
> > > code, JSP's and other stuff used for deployment. After a few builds it
> > > clutters the disk with things that can be checkout again if needed...
> > >
> > > Wouldn't be a good idea to have it as a feature?
> > >
> > > regards
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > emerson
> > >
> > >
> > > On 07/05/2008, Steve Boone <sbb at urbancode.com> wrote:
> > > > That is correct, it only cleans up the artifacts.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:38 AM, emerson cargnin
> > > > <echofloripa.yell at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > But not the source that was checkedout for that workflow run,
> right?
> > > > > at least i had to remove it manually, as after deleting the build
> > > > > life, the sources were still there.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > emerson
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 07/05/2008, Steve Boone <sbb at urbancode.com> wrote:
> > > > > > It deletes all the artifacts of the build.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:16 AM, emerson cargnin
> > > > <echofloripa.yell at gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When I delete a build life, shouldn't it also delete
> everything it
> > > > used
> > > > > > for the build life?
> > > > > > > In my case they were all still there, even after removing the
> > > > build-life.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards
> > > > > > > emerson
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > > > > > > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > > > > > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > > > > >
> > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > > > > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > > > >
> > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > > > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > > > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Anthill-pro mailing list
> > Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill-pro mailing list
> Anthill-pro at lists.urbancode.com
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-pro
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.urbancode.com/pipermail/anthill-pro/attachments/20080507/3f09ad64/attachment.htm
More information about the Anthill-pro
mailing list