[Anthill] Format of version file

[Sushmita Sengupta]

Thanks Eric. That worked.

Thanks for the help.

>From: Eric Minick <eric at urbancode.com>
>Reply-To: Anthill user list <anthill at lists.urbancode.com>
>To: Anthill user list <anthill at lists.urbancode.com>
>Subject: Re: [Anthill] Format of version file
>Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:14:26 -0500
>
>Sushmita,
>
>Sure, at the project edit level, you'll want to change the 
>anthill.version.adapter setting from 
>com.urbancode.anthill.adapter.ProjectPropertyFileVersionAdapter to 
>com.urbancode.anthill.adapter.UrbanCodeVersionAdapter and submit. Once 
>you've done that, you can go back in and specify the file.
>
>Regards,
>
>Eric
>
>Sushmita Sengupta wrote:
>
>>Eric,
>>   You are correct - I notice that in the Anthill OS version(1.7.1.212) 
>>that I am using, the anthill.version.adapter points to 
>>ProjectPropertyFileVersionAdapter and not UrbanCodeVersionAdapter though 
>>the text says that " Right now only the UrbanCodeVersionAdapter is 
>>implemented so do not change this value. "
>>
>>  Is there a way that I can point the version.txt file to 
>>UrbanCodeVersionAdapter so that it can pick up the version from this file?
>>
>>Thanks a lot.
>>
>>>From: Eric Minick <eric at urbancode.com>
>>>Reply-To: Anthill user list <anthill at lists.urbancode.com>
>>>To: Anthill user list <anthill at lists.urbancode.com>
>>>Subject: Re: [Anthill] Format of version file
>>>Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:15:31 -0500
>>>
>>>Sushmita,
>>>
>>>It looks like Anthill thinks that the version number is "version.txt" 
>>>instead of 1.1.1.1 . Is it possible that you are using the 
>>>ProjectPropertyFileVersionAdapter instead of the UrbanCodeVersionAdaper?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Eric
>>>
>>>Sushmita Sengupta wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>  In the FAQs of Anthill it is mentioned that the general format of the 
>>>>version file is
>>>>    <prefix><buildNo><postfix>
>>>>
>>>>    and an example is given as follows:
>>>>    "So if you have a  version such as 1.2.3.4, then 1.2.3. is the 
>>>><prefix>, 4 is the <buildNo> and the <postfix> is an empty string."
>>>>
>>>>   However, I have a version file where I have used the following 
>>>>1.1.1.1 and the build fails with the following error:
>>>>  "Incrementing version: FAILED to build project.  Message: Version 
>>>>String illegal. Can't parse build number. versionStr: version.txt"
>>>>
>>>>Should'nt the version file  take 1 as the build number as per the 
>>>>example? What am I missing in the version file?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks in advance for any help.
>>>>
>>>>_________________________________________________________________
>>>>The Citi Rupee Checking Acct. Send money home free! 
>>>>http://creative.mediaturf.net/creatives/citibankrca/rca_msntextlinks.htm 
>>>>Get fabulous benefits too!
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Anthill mailing list
>>>>Anthill at lists.urbancode.com
>>>>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>>>>
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Anthill mailing list
>>>Anthill at lists.urbancode.com
>>>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>VeriProfile. A matrimonial profile verification service. 
>>http://www.bharatmatrimony.com/cgi-bin/bmclicks1.cgi?74 Only at 
>>BharatMatrimony.com
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Anthill mailing list
>>Anthill at lists.urbancode.com
>>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Anthill mailing list
>Anthill at lists.urbancode.com
>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill

_________________________________________________________________
Get head-hunted by 10,500 recruiters. 
http://www.naukri.com/msn/index.php?source=hottag Post your CV on naukri.com 
today.