[Anthill] (no subject)

[Res Pons]

Also is your Tomcat configured correctly to run multiple instances of 
Anthill?  Don't ask me how to do this, sorry, I wouldn't know.  Just wanted 
to point out, don't forget Tomcat.

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Carlton B" <thelarch at bellsouth.net>
Reply-To: thelarch at bellsouth.net,Anthill user list 
<anthill at lists.urbancode.com>
To: "Anthill user list" <anthill at lists.urbancode.com>
Subject: RE: [Anthill] (no subject)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:11:21 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from lists.urbancode.com ([69.44.154.13]) by 
bay0-mc6-f14.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 20 
Dec 2005 05:16:19 -0800
Received: (qmail 19072 invoked by uid 510); 20 Dec 2005 13:15:42 -0000
Received: from anthill-bounces at lists.urbancode.com by caladin.urbancode.com 
by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.20  (spamassassin: 2.61.  
Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.  Processed in 0.017986 secs); 20 Dec 2005 13:15:42 
-0000
Received: from unknown (HELO caladin.urbancode.com) (127.0.0.1)  by 
lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2005 13:15:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 19033 invoked by uid 510); 20 Dec 2005 13:15:38 -0000
Received: from thelarch at bellsouth.net by caladin.urbancode.com by uid 504 
withqmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61.  
Clear:RC:0(205.152.59.68):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.373533 secs); 20 
Dec 2005 13:15:38 -0000
Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (205.152.59.68)by 
lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2005 13:15:36 -0000
Received: from ibm62aec.bellsouth.net ([68.219.67.132])by 
imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP 
id<20051220131521.IRBN20364.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net at ibm62aec.bellsouth.net>for 
<anthill at lists.urbancode.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:15:21 -0500
Received: from carltonlaptop1 ([68.219.67.132]) by 
ibm62aec.bellsouth.netwith SMTPid 
<20051220131521.BSFX11944.ibm62aec.bellsouth.net at carltonlaptop1>for 
<anthill at lists.urbancode.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:15:21 -0500
X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jFfMLTffd4FOmNdVsG7Fv1wxlo3vwTgIUQ=
Return-Path: <thelarch at bellsouth.net>
Delivered-To: mailman-anthill at lists.urbancode.com
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
caladin.urbancode.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.61
X-BeenThere: anthill at lists.urbancode.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anthill user list <anthill.lists.urbancode.com>
List-Unsubscribe: 
<http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request at lists.urbancode.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.urbancode.com/pipermail/anthill>
List-Post: <mailto:anthill at lists.urbancode.com>
List-Help: <mailto:anthill-request at lists.urbancode.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: 
<http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request at lists.urbancode.com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: anthill-bounces at lists.urbancode.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2005 13:16:19.0714 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[90E20620:01C60567]

Yes, that's all you get.  There will be an .anthill.anthill.properties file
in your home dir that references both installations but only points to one.
You can't run multiple instances without hacking the source code.  However,
it shouldn't be too hard to do this.

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: anthill-bounces at lists.urbancode.com
 > [mailto:anthill-bounces at lists.urbancode.com]On Behalf Of Bankey Bihari
 > Lal
 > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 8:12 AM
 > To: anthill at lists.urbancode.com
 > Subject: [Anthill] (no subject)
 >
 >
 > Hello,
 >
 > I have 2 installations of Anthill on my machine -- c:/anthillOS, and
 > c:/anthillOS_deploy, one for build, and 2nd for deployment. Both of these
 > installations are configured on different servers &ports. One is 
listening
 > on 8080, and other is listening on 8090. My problem is that whenever I
 > change anthill.registery of one installation, these changes are
 > reflected in
 > the other installation as well. System is permitting me only one
 > installation effectively.
 >
 >
 > Regards,
 > Bankey B Lal
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Anthill mailing list
 > Anthill at lists.urbancode.com
 > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
 >

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill at lists.urbancode.com
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/