[Anthill] AnthillOS mistakenly building, using old revision history

[Eric Minick]

Scott,

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I'll see what we can do to 
get it taken care of. You can probably work with the property versioning 
strategy as a workaround (or roll back to 1.7).

Thanks,

Eric

Scott Stirling wrote:

>Hi,
>
>We just installed Anthill OS 1.8.0.264, running on Tomcat 5 and
>configured to use Ant 1.6.5 and the CVS adapter.
>
>Everything seems fine except we get scheduled builds executing full
>builds when there have been no revisions.
>
>In our rev logs when no one's checked in anything we get (every 30
>minutes, which is our continuous schedule interval):
>06/27/2005 20:28:54	Administrator
>	java/build/version/smoke_version.txt: Committed_by_Anthill
>
>And then a full build ensues. We had an older version of AnthillOS
>that ran on the same schedule, but it did not build when there no
>changes.
>
>We also see rev logs from anthill that have the same revision info
>twice, such as this one:
>06/27/2005 20:01:44	joe.blow
>	java/source/com/foo/resource/ResourceManager.java: Change
>java.util.Date references to java.sql.Timestamp for J2SE 1.5
>compatibility.
>
>06/27/2005 20:28:54	Administrator
>	java/build/version/smoke_version.txt: Committed_by_Anthill
>
>And this one:
>06/27/2005 19:58:08	Administrator
>	java/build/version/smoke_version.txt: Committed_by_Anthill
>
>06/27/2005 20:01:44	joe.blow
>	java/source/com/resource/ResourceManager.java: Change java.util.Date
>references to java.sql.Timestamp for J2SE 1.5 compatibility.
>
>Could this be a configuration problem? It sure looks like, according
>to the UI, that we have the build scheduled properly.
>
>Thanks for any pointers,
>Scott Stirling
>_______________________________________________
>Anthill mailing list
>Anthill at lists.urbancode.com
>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>  
>